A lot of people in Toronto (Kareem included) complain that spring no longer exists. It feels like we jump from wearing winter jackets to shorts within a week. Setting aside the alarm this might raise about our changing climate, the team at Gen Squeeze is once again ready for our spring tradition – a deep dive into government budgets.
Over the next couple of months, provincial and federal governments will release their 2024 spending plans. We’ll be there in BC, Alberta, Ontario, and on Parliament Hill in Ottawa with our unique blend of number-crunching and truth-telling. Our goal is to bring you the untold stories about how governments are spending your tax dollars, and whether these investments are generationally fair.
“Don’t tell me what you value.
Show me your budget—and I’ll tell you what you value.”
- Joe Biden
We realize that government budgets might not seem terribly interesting, especially when too many Canadians are worrying about their own finances. But budgets are key moments to promote generational fairness, because they chart the course for everything governments do.
Join the conversation about where your tax dollars are going
BC’s budget is first up this year, on February 22. Paul will be behind the scenes in Victoria to break down spending by age group – something governments in Canada (sadly) still don’t account for, as the Bad Budget Bunny reminds us.
On February 28, we’re hosting our next Community Call to talk about what it means to budget fairly for all generations. We’ll feature hot-off-the-press commentary on the BC budget, and our forecast on what to expect in budgets to come.
Our Community Calls are a place to connect with other like-minded advocates and share questions and ideas, so don’t forget to bring your thoughts about budget winners and losers.
You can register for free here. And stay tuned to our budget season 2024 page for new commentary and information about future events.
If you want to let the federal government know what you think about where to invest, check out Let’s Talk Budget 2024. Sharing our budget recommendations is a quick way to tell federal leaders how best to promote generational fairness. Jump in the conversation until February 9.
“Gen Squeeze is my go-to source for provincial and federal budget analyses. Their team has a knack for translating huge amounts of data and research into crisp takeaways and helpful infographics. For folks who lack the time (or patience!) to sift through extensive budget documents on their own, Gen Squeeze can be trusted to do the heavy lifting and weigh in on how well we are — or aren’t — tackling some of the most pressing issues facing our country.”
— Ian Klesmer, Gen Squeeze supporter
Budgets: How we pay for the Canada we want
The way we spend our money says a lot about what we value. Government spending plans are no different. We've repeatedly found that governments haven’t budgeted well for the large number of retiring baby boomers – and that they’ve been compensating by squeezing investments in younger generations.
So what are we hoping to see in the 2024 budgets? Here’s a snapshot. You can find detailed recommendations for each jurisdiction here.
Put generational fairness at the center of policy and budget decisions by creating Generational Fairness Task Forces.
Ground housing policy in the principle that restoring housing affordability for all requires home prices to stall so that earnings can catch up.
Strengthen accountability by filling in and fixing current data gaps — including what we spend by age, what we spend on treating illness versus creating health, how housing price inflation is measured, and whether we're meeting our climate goals.
Invest adequately in $10 a day child care to make $10 the maximum fee (with no fee for low-income families), while securing fair professional wages for early childhood educators to attract and retain these critical workers.
Protect pollution pricing, because we can't solve our wallet problems by neglecting our climate problem.Please help us share this newsletter far and wide. The more awareness there is about Canada’s broken generational system, the more quickly it will be fixed.
Budgets make clear whether politicians are putting money where their mouths are
Paul had the opportunity to brief the entire Liberal cabinet at the Federal retreat last summer. It was super encouraging to hear Prime Minister Trudeau come out of those meetings promising to do better for younger Canadians.
"We owe it to you to take action, so you can fully benefit from the promise of Canada. So you can succeed and access all the opportunities the generations before you had.”
- Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
But just a few weeks later in the Fall Economic Statement, little new spending was announced to help younger people – even though the government found the funds to boost spending on Old Age Security and medical care for Canadians age 65+ by $150 billion over five years. This massive investment in older demographics accounts for the majority of the $186 billion projected to be added to our national debt over the same period.
In the 2024 budget, we’re hopeful Trudeau’s Liberals will live up to the promise he made last summer, and find a generationally fair balance between supporting healthy retirements and reversing the deteriorating well-being of younger Canadians.
While influencing government budgets might seem like a daunting task, our past successes show that it is possible. See this story in the Vancouver Foundation magazine describing how Gen Squeeze helped turn a $90,000 grant into a $30-billion government investment by successfully branding the $10aDay Child Care campaign.
That’s all for this time, thanks for reading!
In addition to donations to Gen. Squeeze, what else can we do? Does Gen. Squeeze offer a guide on what ordinary citizens can do? We can write to our MPs or call them but how can we apply any pressure on them?
Following the money would be to ask Professor Kershaw if his municipal accessed value of his 2-million-dollar home has gone up proportionately to the market value of his home. Is he paying taxes on a 2-millionaire dollar home? The new home millionaires would be less happy to be home millionaires if their property taxes had them taxed as millionaires. Homeowners' incomes did not rise like the values of their homes. If property taxes were more in line with the skyrocketed market values of homes, you would have these new homeowner millionaires joining generation squeeze to say lower the crazy values of our homes. There should be a stronger relationship between the municipal taxed value of a home and what you can sell it for.
We have competition laws-price gauging laws. A decent society would say anyone selling a home accessed and being taxed for say $500,000.00 and selling it for 2 million or more is price gauging of a worse kind than we bitch about Loblaws doing. It leaves so many unable to afford a home. Selling a home for 2 million when you are paying taxes on a $400, 000.00 home is profiteering in my books. Profiteering off a housing crises making for a far greater housing crises
Weeks ago, I posted below on Squeezes’ Raising our Voices article:
Generation Squeeze needs to get at the false sense of security people feel they have gained by making a generation lose the security we all want in owning a home.
Incomes have not gone up for homeowners like the values of their homes. They should question, can we really afford to live in million-dollar homes? What if city tax assessments were made based closer to the market value of their homes? Those new Millionaires would be less eager to see the values of their homes skyrocket if their monthly tax bills reflected the gross jump in value of their homes! For example, the shock of getting a bill for $1200.00 when you have been paying less than 400.00 a month.
Imagine a homeowner running over to his neighbor's house with his new city tax bill: "have you seen this!!!- the new property assessments...I cannot afford this!...My home is OVER Valued....it's too costly! We need to get the values of our homes lowered!"
Here unaffordable housing is seen as unaffordable and felt as unaffordable by those who own unaffordable housing. How many homeowners look at their city's accessed value of their homes and hope and pray that reassessment based closer to the market value does NOT come soon!!!
Societal consequences from shutting a generation out of owning a home seems to be beyond the thinking scope of most homeowners. Going for their wallets rather than their depth of thinking might jar their false sense of security. The potential property tax increases based more realistically on their new status as millionaires. Having your cake and eating all of it yourself in front of the children is what we are doing. If that sounds sick-that’s because it is.
Unaffordable housing is something we all can’t afford. It must be seen as unaffordable and felt as unaffordable by those who own unaffordable housing.
Generation Squeeze "liked” this comment...but if it is serious in needs to make a serious study of this and report on this.